EPA wants to ban dry cleaning chemical: Set to review 10 other widely:used substances

How do you know the chemicals in this stuff you use and eat are safe? Manufacturers and regulators work hard to ensure that what ends up in the things you buy isn’t harmful. But it isn’t easy. You can’t work out how safe something is by feeding it to people epa chemicals review toxicity 2017 , and seeing what happens next. Apart from the fact that it sometimes takes years for health problems to develop.

toxic substances control act reform

Tsca polymer exemption

if you’re exposed to a hazardous substance, experimenting on people isn’t exactly ethical. This is why toxicologists use animals, and cell cultures, and other tests that don’t involve people. They use these to explore what’s likely to happen in humans. But testing a substance thoroughly still takes a long time – sometimes several years even.

Partly because of this, only a few hundred of the tens of thousands of chemicals we use today have been thoroughly evaluated.

Many the highest priority ones have been tested. But there is still an awful lot of chemicals in use today that we don’t know that much about. Of course, responsible manufacturers do their best to ensure that products are safe as possible. But the slow speed and the cost have many established toxicology tests mean that companies and regulators alike simply cannot keep up with evaluating everything they would like to. They need something better;

Tsca polymer exemption notification

Most importantly, they need some way of triaging the waiting list of untested chemicals, to see which ones are in most urgent need of attention. A few years ago, a group smart people at the US National Academies of Sciences took this problem head on. The result was a weighty report with the promising title of”

“Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century” At the heart of the report was a new idea that would speed up toxicity testing enormously, while reducing the time and resources needed, as well as the number of animals used. The idea was quite brilliant. If we can understand the underlying biological processes that govern how our bodies work – what the National Academies called “toxicity pathways” –

we should be able to come up with simple tests that show how much of a given substance interferes with these processes. And if we could run hundreds of these tests fast, we should be able to quickly get an idea of how safe, or how harmful, a substance is likely to be. The report was a success. So much so that the Environmental Protection Agency,

the National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration, all got together and formed a massive new initiative to transform toxicity testing in the United States. The initiative’s called TOX 21 – short for Toxicology in the 21st Century, and it’s now in full swing. It was launched in 2008,

tsca reform summary

Snur sherwin williams

with four aims: First, to better understand the processes or the pathways that govern how our bodies operate. Secondly, to develop tests to see how chemicals interfere with these pathways. Thirdly, to develop a way to predicting how hazardous substances might be. And fourthly, to identify those substances that are most in need of more detailed safety research. At the heart of TOX, 21 are two cool emerging technologies:

Hight throughput screening, and computational biology. High throughput screening runs chemicals through tests fast. In fact, robots are used to automatically place these substances in tiny test wells and observe what happens next. These tests are designed to indicate how increasing amounts of chemicals interfere with different toxicity pathways.

However, high throughput screening alone is pretty useless. It generates a ton of data, but on their own, these tests it uses can’t tell us whether a chemical will remain in fact cause harm. For this, we need to integrate high-throughput screening with some advanced science, and some powerful computational techniques, And this is when things get interesting.


By combining high throughput screening with advanced data processing and computer modeling, TOX 21 is developing tools that are enabling thousands of substances to be rapidly screened for potential toxicity.

Of course, TOX 21 is just the beginning of transforming how we ensure the safety of the chemicals we use. Ironically, despite the name, it doesn’t provide information on how toxic substance is, just how it may behave in a complex biological system like the human body.

Frank r. lautenberg chemical safety for the 21st century act

And we’re not yet sure how comprehensively it can represent the full glorious 3-dimensional messiness of human biology. But, the process is both highly innovative, and incredibly important for identifying chemicals that might be harmful.

epa form 7710-25

For these chemicals, we still need to use animals to understand better the actual diseases they’re likely to cause. And as always, we also need to understand how much of something causes harm, not just its potential to cause harm.

But the more research we do on predicting what happens in animals and humans from high-throughput screening and computational biology, the more we can refine reduce, and ultimately replace the use of animals in toxicity testing. In the meantime, TOX 21 and similar programs around the world are transforming how we identify chemicals that have the potential to be harmful, and how to do the research that’s necessary to ensure they are used safely. For more information on TOX 21, please do check out the links in the block below. And as always stay safe.

Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *